Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Imperial Metals Corp T.III

Alternate Symbol(s):  IPMLF

Imperial Metals Corporation is a Canada-based exploration, mine development and operating company. The Company’s holdings include the Mount Polley mine (100%), the Huckleberry mine (100%), the Red Chris mine (30%). The Company also holds a portfolio of about 23 greenfield exploration properties in British Columbia. The Mount Polley copper/gold mine in south-central British Columbia is owned 100% by Mount Polley Mining Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The property encompasses about 24,096 hectares (ha) consisting of seven mining leases and 52 mineral claims. The Huckleberry copper mine in west-central British Columbia is 100% owned by Huckleberry Mines Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The property encompasses about 25,767 ha, consisting of two mining leases and 49 mineral claims. Red Chris Development Company Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company, owns a 30% beneficial interest in the Red Chris copper/gold mine in northwest British Columbia.


TSX:III - Post by User

Post by faraway1on May 29, 2022 8:10pm
306 Views
Post# 34715916

A POORLY CONSTRUCTED RIGHTS ISSUE

A POORLY CONSTRUCTED RIGHTS ISSUEImperial Metals has resorted to raising money through the issuance of rights on several accasions. I felt strongly that the last year's issue was weak inasmuch as it left the door open for further issues as the money raised was not sufficient to get them through the reopening of Mount Polley. In that issue, they could have used up to a one for four ratio to raise significant additional funds. 

But here we are now in the midst of another issue which, again, may not provide sufficient funds to avoid further dilution in the future.. When I was in the business and orchastrated rights issues, I would insist on the full participation of insiders and generally would want a backstop so as to guarantee the complete success of the issue.I also would want to raise sufficient funds such that it would be unlikely that additional funds would be required in the forseeable future. In this case, there is an indication that there is an informal committment that some of the insiders and management will exercise but there is no guarantee nor is there a backstop. Furthermore, it is probable the additional funds wil be required over the intermediate term.

So where does that leave us? I suggest that it is likely that Edco, Edwards, Moeller and Kynoch will exercise, representing a little over 46% of the shares outstanding. But what about Fairholme which owns about 18% of the shares outstanding. Fairholme has many pockets and has a history of selling from time to time. So they are a big question mark. Also, in view of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate success of the issue, there may be many smaller investors who will stand aside.

It is certainly possible that Edco, Edwards, Moeller, or some new, unidentified, investor will step in to make the issue successful. But if that does not happen, the result would be very negative from a share price perspective.

Please don't get me wrong. I believe that Imperial has solid assets and that the stock could be a marvellous performer over the intermediate term. But to float an issue with this much uncertainty is an unfortunate mistake.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>