RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:I missed the boatsomewhere in one of PEA's financials i believe they commented that the replacement value of the SHELL infrastructure was $6 Billion.. maybe it was for sale for 3 years so?? DRY nat gas AT THAT TIME was easily below a $1 in the USA and even cheaper per mcf in landlocked ALBERTA -this, being a product of years of over drilling for shale oil plus limited NAT GAS domestic demand . This made the infrastucture equally cheap at that time. THAT WAS THEN-THIS IS NOW- prices of the commoditee itself has skyrocketed due to UKRAINE/EUROPE along with increasing by the day demand requirements extending now into Canada . The gas plants are now equally valuable now due to run away material, manpower delays and by extension how that means ballooning construction costs. Will any of BC LNG projects come to fruition?? How about on the East coast??? NOW, ITS BECOMING LESS IMPORTANT for cdn gas producers because with USA LNG export facilities are now shipping 11-12 Bill cu ft of gas/day, our gas is filling the need for more localized usage. Also, mpore and more cdn producers are getting in DIRECT- ARC energy just signed up to ship a 150 mill cu ft/day thru a Texas based LNG export facility starting in 2025. Was PEA lucky or just opportunistic?? POINT IS they bought for pennies on the dollar as compared to now. AGAIN, always with the NEGATIVE spin eh COMMONSENSE??? badmouthing the stock from DAY1 - its been a series of great trades and not a bad core holding..guess it sucks to be caught NOT HOLDING...regards, dwdc