RE:Fuel cell is the next big thing
whatever you say Jose the preference has clearly been the EV for several reasons. For companies to get hydrogen they need to mine it out from the Earth's crush and then use electrolysis to get the state they need. It is an expensive process. The stations are very expensive although true people have their own stack cells in batteries that are provided on a limited basis which transportability and caution is extremely needed as hydrogen cells are very combustible. Sure people talk about the risk with the ev going up in flames but I get the feeling stack cells are worse. Do you not think if the fuel cells were the cheaper and safer option at the very least both would be produced equally. Ballard moved away from individual cars focusing on specific placements like for fork lifts and corporate fleets not every day consumers and dynacert has used the similar pattern (dya) if these were all as equally viable they would be produced in no less equal quantities. To protect their business proponents are demonizing EVs as being not as clean as ev I will need to look into that and the overall process from production to emissions EVs will require a lot of energy to produce viable hydrogen. In the past you needed to get it from within the Earth I am not sure if there are other ways through water and breaking it down through electrolysis. Let's put it this way if it were cheap or comparable again it would have been simultaneous to the EV at least in so far as I will make my best guess otherwise what's the problem. I held a company called palcan a long time back...bikes that were to be powered by hydrogen fuel cells as well as dynacert which had its hype and has struggled hydrogen is as long if not longer in development than where we have EVs but don't take my word for it do some research and I will be interested in seeing what you will share ;-)