Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Vermilion Energy Inc T.VET

Alternate Symbol(s):  VET

Vermilion Energy Inc. is a Canada-based international energy producer. The Company seeks to create value through the acquisition, exploration, development, and optimization of producing assets in North America, Europe, and Australia. Its business model emphasizes free cash flow generation and returning capital to investors when economically warranted, augmented by value-adding acquisitions. The Company’s operations are focused on the exploitation of light oil and liquids-rich natural gas conventional and unconventional resource plays in North America and the exploration and development of conventional natural gas and oil opportunities in Europe and Australia. The Company operates through seven geographical segments: Canada, the United States, France, Netherlands, Germany, Ireland, and Australia. In Canada, the Company is a key player in the highly productive Mannville condensate-rich gas play. It holds a 100% working interest in the Wandoo field, offshore Australia.


TSX:VET - Post by User

Comment by JohnnyDoeon Jun 08, 2022 6:08am
149 Views
Post# 34739256

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:$ 31.19

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:$ 31.19
mnztr wrote: You can slice it any way you want, but an EV emits far less GHG then an ICE powered vehicle over its lifetime. No one is stupid enough to think manufacturing a 2 ton machine can be done without GHG emissions. 


masfortuna wrote: Psst... It takes 8 yeras of driving an EV before it reaches the same CO2 level that an ice vehicule would emit in that 8 year span.  And this with a 200km battery. The bigger the battery, the more CO2 is required to produce that EV vehicule.  Shhh...Don't tell anybody about this or you will make all the virtue signalling drivers very upset.



Would you have any data that compares apples to apples? Manufacturing the batteries is a carbon emitting process and then there is the matter of generating the electricity. I'm asking about data from the start of the manufacturing process through to end of life. Here's what is clear: the ice vehicle is less carbon intensive to manufacture because it doesn't have the giant battery and when you measure carbon at the tailpipe, you don't capture the electricity's carbon for the driven number of miles. Include that data, draw two lines on a graph, and you'll have an answer.
So if you are saying that an EV emits far less carbon, have you seen an actual apples to apples comparison? Just curious. If you have, please post a link
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>