RE:RE:RE:RE:No Evidence of this Being Viable
Another pro FPX'er/Anti CNC'er. Not much trafffic over on that board in almost a month I see.
I prefer not beating the geology to death as much FUD can be tossed about determining exact mining processes etc by folks who are amateur geos. I'm not a geologist/mine builder and I would bet you aren't either.
Ausenco is one of the top engineering companies in the world that CNC uses so I put my faith in the numbers they signed off on.
7 analysts and 30 plus fund guys think Selby can make this successful and so do I.
BTW, I said "much .4" as in there is .4 grades in some of the holes. I never claimed it was all .4.
Maybe you should watch the youtube interview with the head of exploration. Lots of great info on there to learn the geology makeup that shows why Crawford will be a very profitable mine.