RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Thank Heavens We Don't Have American Style Gun Violence Eh ?So they threaten to take their citizen's lives in Texas if they take other citizen's lives but they still take other citizen's lives.
So threatening citizen's with lesser punishments for lesser crimes should work as well.
The murder rate in states with the death penalty must be less than in the states without it.
https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-and-research/murder-rates/murder-rate-of-death-penalty-states-compared-to-non-death-penalty-states FiddyFiddyOddzz wrote: Correct, they have capital punishment in Texas and it was delivered in Uvalde by a good guy with a gun. What they DO NOT have in Texas is CORPORAL punishment, that's completely different. I'm not saying Sharia law in it's entirety is the answer, just adopting some of it's highlights might be a good idea in regards to punishment of criminal behaviour. Steal, lose a hand, rob, get lashed in public, and so on. It's a multi-cultural world we live in, we can all learn something from everyone. Every culture has something to bring to the table.
Quin wrote:"Like we had back in the good old days?
So if they institute Saudi justice can they cut up people that speak out against them too?
If so, I would be worried if I were you. But you are not worried are you?
Because a free society comes with certain risks and rewards.
If you feel your risk to reward ratio is not in your favour here I am sure there is a place for you.
What was the ratio of good guys to bad guys in Ulvade?
They have capital punishment in Texas.
It sure worked well there."