NeutriSci International Inc V.NU.H

Alternate Symbol(s): NRXCF

NeutriSci International Inc. (NeutriSci) is a Canada-based company, which specializes in the production, and formulation of nutraceutical products within the business-to-business (B2B) industry. The Company is focused on the market development for its nutraceutical products. Its products utilize patented form of Pterostilbene called pTeroPure. pTeroPure Pterostilbene is a form of all-trans Pterostilbene that is found naturally in blueberries and is manufactured for NeutriSci by ChromaDex Corp. (ChromaDex) in the United States. NeutriSci’s neuenergy product is an energy tab designed to deliver enhanced focus and mental clarity with no sugar, no calories and no crash that is associated with energy products. It has developed proprietary IP and technology (NeutriSci IP) that creates an efficient method of bilingual absorption of nutraceuticals into the bloodstream. NeutriSci’s IP can be applied to many different categories in the beverage, food, and nutraceutical space.

TSXV:NU.H - Post by User

NeutriSci International Inc > My Focus

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Comment by Edcandoon Jun 24, 2022 6:03pm

67 Views

Post# 34781563

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:My Focus

Cool. Interesting take

VeritasVern wrote: All points you raise about the possible reasons why the board doesn't buy in the free market, while they have zero shares left is the reason why we would need to question thier contribution and value and if they would need to be re-elected or changed.
Who wouldn't sit on the board, have a meeting once a month and get up to in total 16 million warrants awared with zero risk? If they have little on the line, conrtibute little why would they get privy to warrants. Seriously before you vote, given what we know about the zero share holders wouldn't you want to know what the fack they contribute??
I would say the Masa, the German dude and yourself contribute more than at least two of the directors and if anyone should be on the board it should be those who have significant shares or generates sales as they actually put thier asson-the line. I trust Glen but I am willing to ask the tough questions and ensure he doesn't unjustly first take care of himself, the other directors before the stock holders.

Edcando wrote: I'll try a sincere reply again. I don't know why they wouldn't buy. You'd have to ask them. Maybe they don't have spare cash? Maybe they want to wait and see if we do succeed before buying in? Maybe they feel it would look bad if their first shares were bought in the basement ? Maybe there's something coming we don't know about that would create bad optics (insider knowledge)? I have no idea. Yes it's bullish to see insiders buying but it's also not necessarily a red flag that they aren't (especially when they aren't sucking the well dry with salaries). As for Germany I don't think the price will move at all much less 6 cents on the news. We already know it's coming and we haven't moved at all. I want the news more to confirm we are making actual progress and putting money in the bank. As nonsensical as the market can be, at some point all stocks get priced in property whether it be little by little or all at once (even if only momentarily ). Next time at least I'll sell some shares lol.