RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:OMG PEOPLECyber37,
I have difficulty in understanding some of what you write when compared to actual published performance... Mining realities include many issues such as effectively managing Head grade, optimization of multiple minerals in a deposit, vane-nature of a deposit, etc., etc... When you write that
" I was looking in a sizable production increase after 2 years of promises, but NO….130K …..same old ….same old"
I wish to draw the attention to the K92 Mining reality of :
2018 2019 2020 2021
Actual Gold ozs. produced 45,810 79,838 95,109 95,055
Gold Equiv. ozs. produced 47,237 82,256 98,877 104,196
Avg. Head Grade g/t 19.1 20.8 14.0 9.8
Cash Costs per oz. $589 $494 $651 $614
AISC(All-in sustaining costs) $809 $680 $782 $856
I consider that 130,000 Gold Equiv. ozs. would be a significant production increase(projected range 115,000 to 140,000 ozs.) in year 2022, as an intermediate production growth step, but operational performance, strategic feed-mix and other choices by management are core considerations also.
Peace,
Good decision-making to All,
ElJ