RE:Exhausting rants!!Thanks for the support. His/her ranting doesn't bother me, but I know it clogs up the board with useless cr@p which is annoying to everyone else. If he/she wants to waste their time looking up old posts written in a completely different market climate, go right ahead. Posting a partial clip of one sentence out of a post several paragraphs long to try and discredit me is as pathetic as it gets.
If there are actually investors on this board that believe any of those posts without actually reading the entire post in context then I am truly sorry about how easily you can be swayed and how lazy you must be in doing your own research and due diligence. Those are the people the bashers prey upon; the uniformed and the lazy.
He/she attacks me because much of what I write or wrote is/was threatening to their narrative. I find it hilarious because this person isn't particularly good at bashing when it comes to providing actual information to convince others. Most of their rants are incoherant fragments of sentences which are infilled with insults that reach the intelligence of something written by a six year old. My apologies to those six year olds who can write well beyond the level of this basher.
Those of you who have been here for sometime know that many of those posts were quite extensive in length and in the calculations. The calculations often confrimed what others had calculated and posted here as well and that math showed DM was/is way undervalued compared to various other companies in the industry. I don't think that has changed and many here would agree. If you did disagree then you're either invested in the wrong stock or you have lost your way onto the wrong board.
The only thing that has probably changed is that the valuations are now different in this current market for ALL companies and a few more shares also change those numbers that I calculated. But given that some of those numbers were also calculated at the time using a dilution of 425 million shares, means that not all those numbers are irrelavant and at the time it still showed that the stock was way undervalued compared to other similar companies in that market. The pathetically weak argument many bashers will make is that the market always values stocks correctly and of course most people understand that markets can overvalue and undervalue a stock. DM is certainly undervalued.