RE:RE:RE:Really????This is a game of concentric circles. Those in the middle get the cheapest stock, and as you add new rings outside, the price gets progressively higher. As the number of rings increase, everyone feels like a genius. One day, the velocity of adding new rings at higher prices plummets (for whatever reason). Then the people in the inside rings start unloading while they can, before the rings start to collapse (along with the share price).
You stick "technologies" in the name, but this is the same playbook that the Murray Pezim's of the world have used since the 1980's.
So let's take a step back and think about what insider means. It is not the legal definition from the securities commission. It is the people in the innermost rings that DO NOT have to report. They are done with this story.
I don't presume to speak for Bud, he can clearly take care of himself. The point is simply that if you zoom out and look at the inside rings, AND if you know the history of how these things work, you will come to the same conclusion that he has.
None of the above is to say that there is anything wrong with WELL as a company. Fair minded people can debate the merits of WELL and the appropriate valuation and come to different conclusions. That's a different conversation.
Investorpedia wrote: You are not only dangerous but a very stupid name calling moron. All insider trading are in the public records. Where do you think those numbers came from? Am I pizzed. You bet. You're the clown, and nobody should pay attention to any of your moronic BS postings. Get your jolly's from this one. Bloody nut case.