Blaze announcementis the harbinger that change is on the horizon. They have built a saleable company from the ground up and Tinley's team, while salesmen extraordinaire by reputation, have built Tinley's facility into a viable bottler that should be showing revenue and profit.
Our super sales guys should now be selling and promoting our Tinley's and Beckett's lines and leave the running of our bottling facility to somebody better suited.
It is the lack of numbers to crunch that shareholders are pizsed about and the lack of straightforward answers to the hard questions. There is nothing that a shareholder can use to prove how well this effort is working.
Again, not telling is like lying to a shareholder and especially one that is underwater on their investment.
I can only imagine what Blaze's team is going to do but the 50.1% caught my attention. When you see existing management steering around what all the shareholders want as far as information, you get the sense that there is something nefarious going on.
I like that Blaze has some firecracker management and that they chose Tinley's which makes me think that we should have other interests and offers. Lately there is no mention of the 50.1% issue and/or the expectation of what Blaze getting this will do for existing shareholders. It rankles of a shift in ownership of our company at firesale prices and that our existing management has been complicit in this happening. Sort of like the friends and family special deal.
I hate that I think that but that is an option that I have to consider.
I'm also well aware that cannabinoid beverages are relatively new on the scene and that most of the competition came out of the gate fast but are finding new bottoms in this across the board beatdown that pot stocks are facing. I do believe that Hemp infused are doing better because the laws are more conducive for them than THC infused beverages.
For Tinley's THC infused and all of our competiton, I believe, the starter pistol will be when the lobbyists can reverse the decision to not allow our products in the bar or liquor stores. The expectation of a triggering event to decriminalize pot from Federal schedule one drug definition will launch the great American greenrush which will be 10 times what happened to LPs in Canada based on population alone.
I want to see an honest, no bullshyt effort to sell our Tinley's products and I would also love to see our Beckett's switch to CBD or that could be an option for a new line, before we entertain offers and have the option of looking at several offers if we are the target of a takeover.
Most of all I want some clarity in what is happening as far as Blaze coming on board and I want some numbers to crunch for our Tinley's revenue and our co-bottling revenue.
I don't want a takeout before we announce some significant revenue or sales.
Shareholders first pls and an honest explanation of what is really going on here! Everything I know and believe from my experience suggests that we should be exciting enough to reach our old $2 days when all we had was Hemplify under Jeff, from where we are now compared to then.
glta and dyodd