RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:60% of the road = 270-daysI've had SF (aka Bencro) in my ignore pile so missed this. Did he really say that? For a guy I once considered a Brainiac, I probably need to reconsider after a wild-a$$ assumption like that about pharma. Maybe they were always on the highly profitable needle/shot delivery route, with no regard for aerosol. Apparently SF is not the brainiac he considers himself, but rather a sheep blindlly accepting bigPharma's solutions. There are much better brains here,,,CancerSlayer, Eoganacht, etc etc etc. I think I'lll keep the little fella on ignore, don't need his useless drivel.
99942Apophis wrote: ScienceFirst wrote
If nasal aerosol deliver more efficiency than shots, it would have been a long time ago that aerosol would have been brought to the forefront as it would have given a hedge to the pharma or biotech that would have brought it.
Pharmas already have aerosol for some indications but it is based on facts and science. So if COVID-19 shots would have been the best efficient methods, it would have been brought up.
You definitely have more insight than I do in this matter ScienceFirst however I'm disappointed in your remark simply for the fact that we could also say if TLD-1433 with PDT was more efficient than Radiation & Chemotherapy big Pharma would have developed it already to fight cancer. Perhaps Theralase's nasal via aerosol treatment is what big pharma needs but no one here can really say since its still far too early in their testing!