Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

MGX Minerals Inc MGXMF

MGX Minerals Inc. is a Canada-based diversified resource and technology company with interests in advanced materials, metals, and energy technologies. The Company’s portfolios include Magnesium, Silicon, Lithium, Gold, and Silver. Its Magnesium projects include Driftwood Creek, Marysville, Red Mountain Group and Botts Lake. Its Silicon projects include Gibraltar, Koot and Wonah. Its Lithium projects include GC and Petrolithium. Its Gold projects include Heino, Tillicum and Fran. The Driftwood Creek project is located approximately 164 kilometers (km) north of Cranbrook, British Columbia (B.C.). The Marysville magnesite project is located approximately 12 km (7.7 miles) south of Kimberly, BC. The Red Mountain-Topaz-Cleland magnesite property is located approximately 50 km south of Golden. The Botts Lake magnesite property consists of claims approximately 50 km south of Golden, BC. The Gibraltar project is located approximately 95 kilometers northeast of Cranbrook, BC.


GREY:MGXMF - Post by User

Post by Wangotango67on Jul 22, 2022 4:29am
179 Views
Post# 34842336

Oh Allen...

Oh Allen... You're too funny....
If you read my second last post corerectly -  you'd have read that i was always inline with Co2.
A contributor indeed.  But.. i feel it's moreso - Co - issues.


Take all the gasoline vehicles off the road = less Carbon Monoxide.
Therefore  - people should be asking - what are the effects of carbon monoxide on our atmosphere.

WHAT DOES ONLINE SAY ABOUT - CARBON MONOXIDE ?
Carbon monoxide does not directly contribute to global climate change, but it does react in the atmosphere to produce methane and ozone. Methane and ozone follow only carbon dioxide in their contributions to human-caused climate change.

Oh... ok.
carbon monoxide is twice as potent than co2 but monoxide is a lessor concern than co2.
yet.. monoxides affect the atmosphere to produce methane gases.
Eyes off... monoxides... Stay focused on the people = co2 - wink.

WHAT DOES ONLINE SAY ABOUT - METHANE GASES - 
Methane is also a powerful greenhouse gas. Over a 20-year period, it is 80 times more potent at warming than carbon dioxide. Methane has accounted for roughly 30 per cent of global warming since pre-industrial times and is proliferating faster than at any other time since record keeping began in the 1980s.Aug 20, 2021

There's your puzzle allen...
figure it out.
wink.

METHANE  MOLECULE ( looks like the derivative of nat gas building block to me ) tease.




So add   up all the industrial refineries and manufacturers around the world - throw in - all those transports - now throw in all those zillions of consumer vehicles that pump out carbon monoxide 
= lessor concern than,  co2.

Ok... i can do this,.. 
uhhh... i can slowly beleive this...
lol

Here's your second " task " allen...
Figure this out....

Was comparing different fertilizers - wanting to see where the industry might be headed.
Oh boy... head shaker.

Im sure most know about the " green hydrogen " economy by now - tease.
To keep this post brief,  i came across an article that was peomoting green ammonia.

Of course, it's the gas industry.
Salt water brines can harbor " ammonia " 

The ammonia molecule is made up of,
-  nitrgen atom core
- 3 hydrogen molecules attached

And what would this Norway company do to produce " green ammonia " fertilizer ?
Obviously they's separate the hydrogen for fuel.
And.... what would be left over ?
Yup... the nitrogen molecule.

Yet.. .they're calling it an ammonia fertilizer.
I would say... this sort of labelling is -  side stepping - the actual name of the end produc
= nitrogen.
Which just so happens to be on the worlds  - axing list.

AMMONIA  MOLECULE



Here's the article - GREEN AMMONIA
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/16/firms-line-up-green-ammonia-for-fertilizer-and-future-fuel.html


i DON'T KNOW WHAT'S WORSE...
A company gaining carbon credits for hiding the carbon
A company saying they're lowering carbon emissions -selling the carbon to another to deal with
Sequestering carbon that turns to carbonic acid soup.

So why even mention this ?
Simple.
It's rather surprizing how much fertilizers the gas and fuel industry makes.
Lots of ammonia fertilizers.
And i would go as far and say... too much.
We need a variety of fertilizers for ourt crops .
Not just... phosphates, potassium or ammonias.
We need the micro nutrients and minerals - these large farm operations are depleted.
Over saturated in one or two formats of fertilizers.

If we better managed our mineral concentrates - instead of sending these mined concentrates
overseas to China - we'd have ample minerals for our crops.


Cheers....

Disgruntles investor - waiitng for some spectacular news.
Agenda 2030 was announced  it will kick into high gear - two days ago - by UN.

I guess... Jared is sitting pretty ?
Did they forget about us shareholders ?




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>