RE:RE:RE:lithium batteries replaced by lead batteriesKozmoT wrote: Not sure why you would even post that - Liontown has 150+ million tons of 1.4% Li in Australia.
TTX has 5 million tons of 1% in the middle of the dreaded DRC.
Why would you call attention to the stark contrast?
KozmoT, do i really need to explain it to you?!?!?!? I thought you were smarter than that.
I posted it in contrast to what Strongjay said about Ford saying no to lithium. It has nothing to do with Tantalex. Though i find it funny how you so quickly spin every little event into Tantalex and use it as an opportunity to bash the company.
Do i also need to explain to you again that Tantalex has 3 projects, i REPEAT, 3 projects on the go.
1)
MANONO TAILINGS 2)
PEGMATITE CORRIDOR EXPLORATION 3)
LUBULE TIN & TANTALUM You need to get past the first one. Regardless of the % grade or the quanity and whether it meets your high standards. An economic assessment with we done during Q4. With the price of lithium these days and the easy access to the tailings they feel it's cost effective and that's good enough for me.
If you ask me it's just icing on the cake, as is the Lubule Tin and Tantalum Project. My money is on the Corridor Exploration project. They have a vast amount of land in what may be a lithium enriched area (based on AVZ's findings). A closology play? say what you will but when the pegmatite adjoins and runs all the way through our lot, i feel pretty good about that, dispite of all your spin and negativity.