first ammendmentLove these guys that think they can come to a Canadian websiite and do what is legal in the
USA........da.....we don't have the first ammendment in Canada/ Argument is moot.
Must have read my post about guys being found liable. CEO is CDN>
@Badteeth @giK Dude, time for another course in Constitutional Law maybe? The 1st Amendment protects me and the statements I made to a third party (this website) against claims of defamation by private parties (promoters). I was clearly inferring the protection afforded to me in the event your promoter buddies decide to litigate because I questioned their historical performance. Oh, and hey @flyby1969, a bunch of these promoted securities do trade as foreign ordinaries in the States, and NFG is listed on a US exchange. That means the SEC's antifraud provisions apply extraterritorially to this group of promotors even if they are not physically located in the US. Not that I'm implying they defrauded anyone, but we can only know through discovery. So, I'm wondering if any of the aforementioned entities would like to publicly state for the record that they did not collude in the same securities in a manner that can be deemed to be in violation of US Federal and SEC securities laws? Just asking a question. :) @Badteeth @giK Dude, time for another course in Constitutional Law maybe? The 1st Amendment protects me and the statements I made to a third party (this website) against claims of defamation by private parties (promoters). I was clearly inferring the protection afforded to me in the event your promoter buddies decide to litigate because I questioned their historical performance. Oh, and hey @flyby1969, a bunch of these promoted securities do trade as foreign ordinaries in the States, and NFG is listed on a US exchange. That means the SEC's antifraud provisions apply extraterritorially to this group of promotors even if they are not physically located in the US. Not that I'm implying they defrauded anyone, but we can only know through discovery. So, I'm wondering if any of the aforementioned entities would like to publicly state for the record that they did not collude in the same securities in a manner that can be deemed to be in violation of US Federal and SEC securities laws? Just asking a question. :)