RE:RE:RE:RE:Latest Fed rate hike didn't phase goldAlwaysLong683 wrote: BeelzeBucc wrote: So on the one hand you think they are choreographing results, which they would only do if they are running out of good intersections, and on the other hand you own it.
Great move.
Bucco
Yes, I suspect they are withholding bad assay results. Yes I think it is wrong to do so. I invested in NFG about 1 1/2 years ago when I could see no trace of this type of behaviour. However, the fact remains that they have hit the following:
146.2 g/t Au over 25.6m = 3,743 gxm
124.4 g/t Au over 17.7m = 2,202 gxm
261.3 g/t Au over 7.2m = 1,881 gxm
150.3 g/t Au over 11.5m = 1,728 gxm
You ask a lot of questions to other people, so here's one for you:
Name me a gold explorer anywhere in the world that has produced four or more cores as good as or better than the above in the past 2 years?
No rush - take your time, do some Google searches, ask your real or imaginary "geologist friend", etc. I think three days should be long enough for you to reply on this BB by either telling us the name of the company so we can check it out for ourselves, or admit you are unable to come up with one and thus recognize these cores are the best metal factor results in the world over the past 24 months.
P.S. "Veiny veiny" is not an answer. Veiny veiny or not, the grades and metal factors are breath-taking and extremely rare, especially when you land four of them on your property.
I / we await your answer....
Whoops this is the better one not to say the other one was too shabby.
Love that Buck admits he does not believe in gold stocks yet where does he lurk and
spend his time running down stocks.
Tearing down with doubt and doubting anyone as credible and then he runs down
anyone that responds.
Before you consider leaving this board please put this individual on ignore.
You are a credible poster to those that listen. IKE