Micron case argued yesterday. What happens to the sale process if the judge agrees with Micron that their chips don't practice the accused IMS technology and issues a summary judgment of non infringement.
Read the Micron argument. It is very compelling.
The court construed the asserted claims 42-44 of the 063 patent as "write-once memory cells" as "memory cells that cannot be written more than once.
Micron asserts that their technology can be written to more than once and therefore don't infringe the technology.