RE:RE:Single most important changeCancerSlayer wrote: As reported in the 5/30/2022 MD&A for 360 day data:
5 of 23 evaluable patients were CR (22%)...2 patients from Ph1b
4 of 23 evaluable patients were PR (17%)
Today's report:
9 of 26 evaluable patients were CR (35%)...2 patients from Ph1b
3 of 26 evaluable patients were PR (12%)
As of today, there are 4 additional 360 day CR patients & an increase in 3 total evaluable patients (23 to 26) since 5/30. All 4 additional CR patients received two optimized treatments & 1 of the 4 appears to have converted from PR to CR. The one who converted may either have converted naturally post the 2nd treatment or was found to have UTUC or cancer outside of the bladder (a de facto CR). The moral of this story...full optimization works & not all PRs are bad ; ).
Upon further review of the May 30 data reported...
360 day 450 day
CR 5 5
PR 4 2
NR 14 15
P 18 19
It appears one of the 360 day PRs converted to an NR & the other one was still pending at 450 days. This suggests the one pending PR patient at 450 days was ultimately found to have UTUC & was therefore converted to a CR for the 360 day assessment. So this PR patient would not have naturally converted to CR as I mistakenly noted in my prior post...