RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:PP filled....:) perhaps it all comes down to a lot of things and there are many different ways to look at this no doubt... we can both agree we have 20% of treaty creek and that does not change.. so yes we are in a good place. perhaps I am looking at this wrong feeling our sell price will be a percentage of TUD vs Treaty Creek.. That is a good argument on it's own I suppose .. If when this gets sold we are paid according to the price TUD gets then Dilution will play a part in the formula .. So with this thought in mind I still prefer TUD raises money at higher dollars not lower. That first PP TUD did at 4$ with Sprott carried us a long ways with little dilution... But it also may have put pressure on the stock if the PP was a short??. Now that is a whole other argument in itself.. For me to even say this stings but sometimes I wonder. When you look at how many companies he financed right at the top of the cycle I get suspicious, but heh it is what it is.. The dollars produced results, turning up ounces, and this in the end is what shareholders will be paid for... These are my own thoughts is all. right or wrong. Jetstream I appreciate your posts, just ignore me if I am getting under your skin.