RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:PP filled....Besides it wasn't you that posted this...
"I don't understand your logic, no matters how many million shares Tud have or issued, AMK still owns 20% of Treatycreek anyway. The shares price ratio between AMK and Tud is not related at all to the quantity of shares each company have."
If all we were paid on is ounces I would agree with this but it isn't true if we are paid according to TUD share price and in my mind that is exactly what will happen... If the sell price is according to ounces only then this post is correct.... we could go on for a long time I suppose trying to wrap our heads around this.. Does anyone have any solid examples of this that helps me understand I am looking at this backwards.. I very well may have been... This is a nice thought for sure.. or we could just drop this topic and say to ourselves as long as TUD drills up more and more ounces and AMK as we know doesn't suffer dilution thus our 20% is 20% and that never changes.. perhaps I just answered my own question lol...