Reply to baggerx99baggerx wrote:
"Clearly evident mrmo you are relentless to bash DM, sour grapes at some point, CT??"
Bashing??? Who's bashing here? Certainly not me, i just post facts. I'm not the one who did the wrote the article. I guess you can say that if that deceptive article didn't exist, i probably would not have said anything. But unfortunately for investors, someone at G&M head office decided to greenlight that piece. I'm just responding to it as any good, knowledgeable investor should. Don't you want to know the REAL good investments in a certain sector you wish to invest in? Or for whatever you wish to buy in real life? If you were looking to buy a car, and were looking around for some "perspecitve & guidance" and some aquaintance came up to you and said the best 5 cars were Volvo, BMW, Honda, Lada & Porcha and you should look to buy any of those? Would you not question it, especially if one seems a littlle (LOL) out of place and really should not be there?
Your criticism should be directed at those that merit it not me. I'm just reacting to something which one, does not make sense, two is factually deceptive & wrong and three should be rectified by someone that knows. I understand your frustrations but dude, think about those poor folks who don't know squat in this arena. Think about being in their shoes. I personally cannot stand idly by a let that stand without some "minor" intervention on my part. It's the bare minimum that is required.
GLTA