RE:RE:RE:More facts!What a foolish thing to say! You truly don't believe that analysts and institutional buyers show up based upon the age of a company or even take that into account do you?...... It's pretty simple. RESEARCH, RESEARCH, RESEARCH.....and when you find a company with immense growth potential, depending on what your assume the risk to be, but in at good prices......... But you knew that, just like me, your are accumulating shares right now, or else you wouldn't be here trying to influence people to sell......the only people pushing others to sell, are those that want to buy. Cheers
sorrenson wrote: Started.....Let's try to keep it in perspective and be accurate for readers
this company formed 1991 and went public in 2011. Hpq public for substantially longer. These are far from 'starting"
Aarman4 wrote: The companies that I have made the highest multiple of returns, have all stated with very low institutional ownership and no analysts. Net selling during a bear market and broad market sell off, particularly in smaller companies? Doesn't bother me at all... Selling never does. I have done my research, I have made my phone calls, and, for me, I have conviction that today's share price is a bargain. But that is me, if you come to a different conclusion, that is fine. I'm putting my money on that conviction. Disclaimer: I own pyrogenesis, and have a long term view on the company. I have no clue what the share price will do over the next 6 months or a year, and neither does anybody else, however, I've allocated a large amount of my portfolio towards the company and I feel it will pay off, big time, anywhere from 2-10 years. But what do I know?
tamaracktop wrote: Doesn't it bother anyone that the biggest institutional holder here has 200,000 shares? Doesn't it bother anyone that 7 of the 9 institutions that own this have been net sellers? Doesn't it bother anyone that not a single analyst covers this? If it doesn't, you should think about that for maybe the first time.