RE:RE:Broker1 Hmm
Rationalizing to fit yiour argument just doesn't cut it,
So what happened during this period...are the institutions selling or not in part or whole those 202 k shares or is it conveniently now that broker 1 does not reperesent institutuions which is the arguemnt you have been preaching all along ?
You just can't have it both ways to suit your argument,
Looks to me that you just abhore being challenged in any way !
Starsearcher80 wrote: Hmmm, not sure why you arbitrarily chose Sept 15th as your start date. As you have the same access to the data, you would of course know that on Sept 16th (5 trading days ago), there was an anomoly to the normal flow, with an outflow of 140,000 shares on that day from House 1. You would also know that this torques the data, and you would also know that this short time frame means nothing.
So let's straighten this out here to something that actually means something.
1) The top of the recent market was about August 15th.
2) Since that date, the market has now fallen a staggering 4000 points.
3) Also since August 15th, and refering to House 1, House 1 has BOUGHT a net 289,000 shares of Bombardier, in the midst of this 4000 point drop.
That seems far more significant, and in context, than some short time frame that means nothing and contains an anomoly. Data presented without reason or context is thin.
clubhouse19 wrote: So far from sept 15 till now Broker ! has sold 202.2 k shares more than they bought. I trust it is not all institutions that sold just like it is not all institutions when the number is positive.
Institutions buying for funds are not normally in it for the short trade.