Bombardier Inc. T.BBD.A

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Broker1

[Starsearcher80]

Not worth responding, as you just don't seem to get it.  Oh well.  Better to focus on the stock anyway.

clubhouse19 wrote: Nothing has changed as you continually argue in circles and dare someone chellneges you and then come up with the ignorant insinuation.
 As in the past, you have crownned your self as king even though the facts are there but you continue to refuse to answer the simplest questions and go with the circular arguements even though they are in front of you.
 A  la Trump I would say while you cite you so called savey past which to me on this broker1 thing is hocus pocus as you cite NO facts and others should just believe your highness.
  Don't bother anymore...just believe what you will 

Starsearcher80 wrote: I have no problem being challenged, provided the challenge is intelligent. As for "rationalizing to fit your argument", that was exactly my point of what you had done in the first place. Throwing some number out there (as you did), with an anomoly that torqued the number (as you did), and providing no context or backdrop (as you did), is effectively worthless, other than to thinly and obviously support some misguided narrative that you want to put out there which only serves to obscure reality. And when that happens, it's worth calling out. Again, please read carefully, and think, before shooting your mouth off in some misguided direction.

clubhouse19 wrote:    Hmm
Rationalizing to fit yiour argument just doesn't cut it,

So what happened during this period...are the institutions selling or not in part or whole  those 202 k shares  or is it conveniently now that broker 1 does not reperesent institutuions which is the arguemnt you have been preaching all along ? 

  You just can't have it both ways to suit your argument,
Looks to me that you just abhore being challenged in any way !

Starsearcher80 wrote: Hmmm, not sure why you arbitrarily chose Sept 15th as your start date.  As you have the same access to the data, you would of course know that on Sept 16th (5 trading days ago), there was an anomoly to the normal flow, with an outflow of 140,000 shares on that day from House 1. You would also know that this torques the data, and you would also know that this short time frame means nothing.

So let's straighten this out here to something that actually means something.

1) The top of the recent market was about August 15th.

2) Since that date, the market has now fallen a staggering 4000 points.

3) Also since August 15th, and refering to House 1, House 1 has BOUGHT a net 289,000 shares of Bombardier, in the midst of this 4000 point drop.

That seems far more significant, and in context, than some short time frame that means nothing and contains an anomoly.  Data presented without reason or context is thin.

clubhouse19 wrote:  So far from sept 15 till now Broker ! has sold 202.2 k shares more than they bought.   I trust it is not all institutions that sold just like it is not all institutions when the number is positive.

  Institutions buying for funds are not  normally in it for the short trade.