RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Roger's 43-101 FB Post As part of Roger’s quote was cut off in Smittys original post. Here’s the rest with the very important last line he mentioned.
I’ve certainly seen a few obviously fraudulent “43-101” reports out there. No QP in their right mind would sign off and it’s certainly a ridiculous example but hopefully this demonstrates a point. QPs and professional societies are self-regulating so us, as an industry, need to call out bad apples when we see them and more importantly, educate non-technical folks to understand differences in disclosure from sound technical work program. What should always be sought is high-quality technical work following CIM guidelines, documented in a thorough NI 43-101 TR, all of which overseen by acceptable QP(s). It’s critical to understand the differences between “good industry practices” and disclosure.