RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Tesla mega pack fire
The point you were trying to make was this: "VRFBs are going to profit from a recent fire of a Tesla battery pack". My reply was "VRFBs are not going to profit from this fire as there are many alternatives to Li-Ion and VRFBs are losing out to these alternatives evidenced by several big deals struck for alternative technologies as opposed to no recent deals for VRFBs". I was asking: "When did "team V" strike the last deal?" and you replied by posting a link referring to projects that were started years before the fire happened.
There were several fires of Li-Ion battery packs like this one https://www.energy-storage.news/arizona-battery-fires-lessons-can-be-learned-by-industry-to-prevent-further-incidents-dnv-gl-says/
Neither have previous Li-Ion fires kickstarted VRFB sales nor will one most recent one do so.
BTW, today's VRFB deals are (a tiny fraction of) tomorrow's V demand. With zero VRFB deals announced in recent months, what does it mean for future VRFB-generated V demand?