Petroteq Energy Inc V.PQE.H

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Petroteq & Valkor

[stockshack]

We pick and choose companies that we think will have a future. Doing so means we have to sort through all the information out there and separate the wheat from the chaff. CEOs have to shed their companies in the best light and sometimes they get carried away. If it's too good to be true, it is. The other side of the coin is investors are hungry for a quick buck and tend to believe the "to good to be true" more often than not. The draw back for retail investors is we don't have the resources to run all over the country visiting companies and talking to CEOs. If you're a good judge of character, meeting and talking to a CEO can make or break the investment bar none. But not being an institution with an expense account i have to rely on the internet. After all the internet is always right, right. 

ScarletSpider wrote:
despite oil being out of favor the reality is until the alternatives can be successfully implemented in a way broader scale the best option is oil and gas. With production and supply slow downs trying to get the best alternative energy which is as effective as fossil fuels there is a long ways to go. It is simply stupid in many ways to throw the baby out with the bath water. In fact as I may have stated here a lot of the so called green energy is just as bad if not worse than oil and gas on a net result basis. It is short sighted and totally misrepresenting green energy without fully taking the production cycle fully into account. I used to be hugely against oil and gas but when I held solar shares for over 7 years along with hydrogen companies well all energy have their huge short comings so only to demonize one and over and misrepresent others is criminal. Even crypto is as if not more destructive than oil and gas yet there is no huge and unrealistic restrictions placed on them. If governments want to be fair minded and regulate things properly if you put unrealistic and crippling restrictions on one sector you need to do the same to others which are equal if not as bad in carbon emission and pollution regardless of where that effects us...air water ground etc. You can't have double standards here and on top of it unrealistic carbon reduction goals. It is the governments that stupidly created things that resulted in oil and gas losing favor where in truth things like electrification solar etc are not all that they seem to be. What is heavily needed is fair and impartial scientific bodies that assess every possible energy source and fairly assess them on net carbon impact from the start of production to end and what I am willing to bet is that all sources will be pretty equal to the other. I highly doubt oil and gas will be stomped out but will likely be reduced and energy sources more balanced in an energy mix which draws on strengths from each one trying to compensate for the weaknesses. In other words it will not be all solar hydrogen etc etc I don't believe that will ever happen definitely not in my life anyways. But I am a lay person and the one thing I am betting heavy on is oil and gas which has been greened. I would not have bought shares in any other way. I love the process here as well as in another company I hold and by personal philosophy am fully ok with this holding. Monetary wise I have been bitten by clean tech but the fault lies with my not handling the shares properly as I was quite heavily up in some and ended up losing when I shouldn't have. Regardless awesome discussion and now as I said I need to figure will I roll the dice and be full in as I am with my other oil and gas holding or will I turn tail on some I don't know as of yet although the plan is just to hunker down as I am with the other. Well great to see a constructive exchange here and hopefully they remain so with facts.