RE:Yea, why!I strongly disagree.
If Tinley diluted shares to buy Bev that would be one of the stupidest business decisions yet, and Tinley's made some stupid decisions that seem intentional from the outside looking in.
How about getting their drinks into more than once province with Peak first, for more than 1-year and display what the importance of buying a Canadian licensed beverage producer would provide? Especially Bev, having them produce Tinley's drinks in Canada is a mistake in the first place.
Hexo produces for Cann and their drinks are shipped to multiple provinces.
Bev produces for Keef and ship to other provinces.
Why can't Peak produce for Tinley and ship to other provinces.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves and put the cart before the horse.
They need to stay focused on Cali, Interstate commerce between law abiding states, and Beckett's in 27 states, Canada is sooo overregulated at the moment with "beverages" especially it would be extremely premature to attempt buying anything Canadian related unless it's to add alcohol for Beckett's & ship worldwide with a new face to promote the brand.
If Tinley's going to buy anything it should be a real CEO with clout.
If Tinley can't buyback shares yet they shouldn't be buying other companies, smh...