Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

FormerXBC Inc XEBEQ

Xebec Adsorption Inc designs, engineers, and manufactures products that are used for purification, separation, dehydration, and filtration equipment for gases and compressed air. The company operates in three reportable segments: Systems, Corporate and other, and Support. Its product lines are natural gas dryers for natural gas refueling stations, compressed gas filtration, biogas purification, associated gas, engineering services, and air dryers. The company's geographical segments are United States, Canada, China, Other, Korea, Italy, and France.


GREY:XEBEQ - Post by User

Post by ZouZS3on Oct 04, 2022 11:37pm
384 Views
Post# 35005855

Answer

Answer
Details are light right now so it is hard to ascertain what has really happened here. We expect banks got nervous and pulled credit lines, forcing a company reaction. Higher natural gas prices have certainly been one contributing factor here. With debt at $40M and negative cash flow, we would not expect much for shareholders in a restructuring. Selling when able we think remains the best option. Basically, many things went wrong. Its margins were far lower than the company predicted. Thus, contracts proved less profitable and cash flow was negative instead of positive. New contracts required capital which the company did not have. Management certainly screwed up but analysts/managers (us too) did as well. It was a situation that despite the 'green' aspect and the high growth of the company and sector, companies need to make money at the end of the day. We think that, in a better market, it likely could have raised capital to try and continue. But in bear market investors have little patience to throw more money after bad.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>