RE:RE:RE:Well #3.I do not know how how they will assign damages, share price was headed up till news hit, then did an about face. DME had a state permit to drill and did in fact drill the well. In the review process, Flagstaff would have been contacted and as I understand it, was contacted on several occasions before drilling and had no comment. The change in mayors and council members then precipitated the filing to stop work on the well, really usurping the state's authority in such matters. As such, it is considered, "interferring with trade" which is a legal term and has consequences. DME jumped through all the hoops, and went beyond "normal" drilling practices by triple walling the pipe. and in court DME prevailed in the court case and the court ruled "with prejudice" against Flagstaff. It was a frivolous lawsuit. DME could certainly make a case for damages based on reversal of share price, what known field would do to the companys share price, time delays, etc.