RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Key Piece of Information on StormYou can call me out for what ever you think, I offered them as a way to show that parcels of land that get left by majors, can turn out to be good.......you were suggesting that because BHP left projects, that they were therefore not going to be good. I disagreed with it and called you out on that.
So the gelogist that worked for the major that said that the Dixie property was no good, was wrong I guess. Maybe you work for the Junior Mining Sector, doesn't mean you are right....that geologist was obviously wrong. Now that's realism!
BHP sold a nickel play in the middle of Australia because they didn't 'want it'.....funny how they are now trying to buy it back again. Cant be cheap getting that ore to market but hey, I guess you have an answer for that as well.
I tried being fair and agreeing on parts of your arguments but you just keep on changing. You must have one big beef against BAY.
schocor wrote: I believe you were attempting a drive by comparing the successful, strategically located, successful GBR with Storm; and I am calling yuo out for it.
GBR had great success; that doesnt mean the underfunded jokers at AW1 are giong to do the same.
P.S - I know ONE other person who frequently mentions GBR when talking about storm and refers to this project as "ours" - got my eye on you (sorry got my eye on TU).