RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Next NRSMlachake wrote: This is the part I really don't get either. Just compounding the loss from invested cash flow over several years.. unbelievable!.
It's like reading a thread from people who have no idea as to how business functions.
Did you ever consider the possibility that the liabilities were greater than the "benefits" of the proposed work program and that it did not meet their business objectives?
Again, I reiterate "commercial and operational issues".
I'm not stating this as fact, but merely highlighting a possibility.
But, having said that, what I see here is that the actions of SGE re-engaging SNV once again adds value to SNV's stake in the PSC.
Pay us to go away or sign and get on with it!!!!