RE:Making Pyrogenesis GreenerThe generators required to run the system would likely cause more pollution than the plastic. Works great on a Nuke carrier as they have clean power,
recovery of energy would be too expensive
incineration really doesnt fit the "clean up " image
The cost would take all the money from the CEO . Non profit means all the cash goes to the owners, Its not acharity
PFAS was tried on cruiseship s decade ago and scrapped
chickendinner wrote:
Since the contract for the destruction of PFAs was suspended and discontinued which would have made a nice division of Pyro for cleaning up the planet. Since its termination Pyro engineers have a little more time on they hands. I was thinking there is a non profit organization called The Ocean Clean up that trying to rid the oceans of plastic and i thought this might be a great opportunity and cause to get involved in. the organization basically targets, captures, extracts and recycles the plastic, but i know not all plastics and things floating in the ocean is recyclable. wouldn't it be amazing if Pyros waste to energy unit were installed on their boats negating the for the boats to come in and unload. they could stay at sea for longer periods destroying the plastic. just a thought. what do you guys think?.