RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sneak Preview - Major Walks 1) True. But, CEO cannot make any statement regarding anything but the completion level of associated tasks. Any other statement regarding RIO opinion of due diligence woudl have to come from them. CEO has subesequently provided rough estimates of completion and more recently completion of those associated tasks.
2) Chairmen screwed that one up. Even longs have stated as such on this board.
3) Anyone who know anything about mining, which apparently you don't, knows that assay results are proved by an independent engineering firm. Publishing of results can only happen AFTER that girl has completed analysis AND generated an official report.
4) WRN has tracked associated metals and the majors in the mining space. No better and no worse.
5) Valuation and value is very debateable, and everyone has very different opinions amongst even the longs. In the end we'll know.
See, what you do is take facts and spin them (distort) in such a way as to portray the absolute most negative interpretation possible, no matter how outlandish it is. Like comparing some deal between some miner nobody has even heard of and a deal falling apart with a completely unrelated asset to WRN. That my friend is 100% in line with the definition of distortion.