RE:RE:RE:Excitement starting??MetzGER wrote: This theory about the 1 Year arbitration was a Big joke. Lee Buckler was checking this Forum and laughing about us being so stupid to believe that Shiseido arbitration would be resolved within 1 year.
i am so Angry about myself believing that this october the nightmare would be over. I am a fking idiot!!!
Those that follow Replicel closely may have been mislead about the Arbitration having a time limit of 1 year.
Here is a link to the rules for the
International Center for Dispute Resolution https://www.icdr.org/sites/default/files/document_repository/ICDR_Rules_1.pdf?utm_source=icdr-website&utm_medium=rules-page&utm_campaign=rules-intl-update-1mar
I have read this thoroughly and fail to see any reference to a 1 year time limit of the Arbitration. I may be wrong.
The key part of the Arbitration process is the Hearing (Article 26). Once the Hearing takes place:
-
"the final award shall be made no later than 60 days from the date of the closing of the hearing pursuant to Article 30. "
The key question here is has the Hearing taken place and if not why ?
In that regard when you read Article 40 Confidentiality there is no reference to preventing the company from keeping the shareholders informed about what stage the Arbitration process is in.