RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Yes...I have sunk If we are just going by company's current financials and the markets reaction and disregard the company's tech and how it may be useful to huge companies etc etc, I can see how you have come to your opinion.
Though we may not see eye to eye, I certainly do appreciate how honest you are!
tamaracktop wrote: I don't mind legitimate questions in the least.
I'm not a patent lawyer, but I have in fact read more than a few patents over the course of my career at RBC.
I've never read any belonging to Pyrogenesis so I'm not even qualified enough even to proffer an opinion about anything even as basic as what exactly the company's patented technology even is.
But this doesn't disqualify me from posting an informed opinion, although some here might scoff at that statement.
Admittedly, my opinions are sometimes wrong.
Sometimes disastrously so, as was the case recently, but very rarely.
The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry. -Robert Burns
I'd bet most of the posters here have never examined this company's patents either.
I don't bullsh*t, and I stick to my own bailiwick, which is the markets and company financials.
The glaring thing that is sounding alarms and flashing red lights is that this company is scraping the bottom of the barrel cash-wise.
There is no question whatsoever that it's running on fumes.
If it doesn't do something about that very very soon. it doesn't matter what intellectual property they own.
A firehose is completely useless without water.