RE:RE:Pyro need to build Trust with InvestorOn Agoracom I asked the CEO
"C: Can you provide investors with a current operating cost analysis of Plasma, Natural Gas, Bio Fuel and Hydrogen based on million BTUs basis or similar . Please include bunker for comparison purposes. D: Can you confirm the thermal efficiency of PYR's 1 or 3 meg plasma torches ,
I expect no response despite company having the info and investors needing the information to make informed financial decisions.
That will be my weekend project to update a 2013 Report by a guy called P Carabin from a company called Pyrogenesis. They did not include Natural Gas , Bio Oil and obviously the electrical cost is outdated.
Plasma is 70 % effecient , Biooil or B100 would be 80% and Natural Gas would be 85%
The CEO has been asked several times including at the AGM and no response. Im hoping he gets Mr Carabin to update his chart on page 64 today, Rip off the bandaid and provide the information to the investors.
You would not buy a car without knowing gas mileage
[url=chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.pyrogenesis.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2013-03-TMS-Plasma-Torches-for-Metallury-paper.pdf]Plasma costs on effeciency P Carabin 2013 Funny how the company wont update and add Natural gas and Biooil for comparison[/url]
Other funny thing is the AUG 22 Fact report from Rio Tinto where there is zero mention of plasma despite addressing all the other decarbonizing
Rio Tinto Fact Book Aug 2022..no plasma anywhere to be found
fdfd12 wrote:
It is obious in the stock price.
In my opinion, because the way the stock price is acting, the torch deal fell through.
Something went wrong.
The market moves ahead of the news.