Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Comment by Uraniuman308on Oct 22, 2022 3:55pm
96 Views
Post# 35041237

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Last September

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Last September

greenday, show me where it says FCU is not obligated.  When the deal was announced I recall management addressing the issue by saying the spot will be much higher.  If a moot point, why the comment?  And while your at, go tell your bank that you are not going to be making a mortgage payment for the foreseeable future because interest rates have gotten to the point where you can no longer afford to.  Good luck with that, lol.  JMO


Greenday wrote: @Karen308 - The point you made - in case you forgot - is that FCU is obligated to supply CGN even if the spot price is below the cost of production.  That's wrong.  There is nothing in the agreement stating that.  That's just something that's in you head.  

FCU is only obligated to supply CGN with 25% of its production at a 5% discount to spot and it has a right to purchase an additional 10% of FCU's production when FCU is producing.

If the spot price dropped below FCU's cost of production then FCU could stop producing and CGN's right to FCU's production would be the same as it is now.  Only binding when FCU is producing.

You can debate whether supplying CGN with 25% of FCU's production at a 5% discount to spot is desirable to you or not but I have no problem with it.  I'm sure that other start up producers would jump at that deal too because it desrisks the commissioning of the project.  

If you don't believe that, go to your banker and tell him that you're starting a new company and you have a deal in place with one of the world's largest customers for your product.  Then tell a different banker that you have an idea of who your customers for your product will be.  Then see which banker will be more receptive and give you better financing for your project.  Heck, banker #2 might question your projections and not even be interested at all. 

Besides that, there are costs associated with selling anything.  FCU could run around during the commissioning phase of production and spend money trying to find customers or it could just decide that a 5% discount to spot is close enough to the overhead cost of selling anyways.  

Look at what NXE is doing.  NXE is spending money to put their logo on the helments of the Vancouver Canucks to help publicize their name and presumably to help find and establish customers.  That advertising cost isn't free and they still don't have a customer for their uranium.

So in my view, the preferential financing position and reduced overhead spending is worth the 5% discount to spot. 

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>