RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Joe said TAAT was attending Chicago's FOA 7-Eleven event$$Frogzilla wrote: That's ridiculous Daryl, and this was explained thoroughly, only you have comprehension problems and hear what you want to hear! I have explained it to you a dozen plus times, just like Nov sales numbers, just like Dec/Jan production halt, etc., etc., etc.!
You're just to busy flapping your gums on all the stock boards to do any real research. This was highlighted again, when you questioned my post about B&B Beyond bringing in the GAMA partnership!
You wanted proof they brought this contract to TAAT. SOOOO I showed you the PROOF from the press release the day before, the one you were to busy bashing & trashing to read!
If only you knew, how stupid you look with all these posting handles, very lame, and it truly does tell the whole story about you! To be clear, its just not the number of handles and why you have so many, but the names you choose for these posting handles paints a vivid picture of your decaying psyche!
Have fun wasting another day posting hogwash! Beware, you are being watched, and we all know how the "I'm Judgement Proof" defense went Daryl!
Who invited you to this thread to spew such garbage and make yourself look even more foolish?
So Mr. SmartiePants: Tell us why Setti and Joe were not wrong with their answer to that question about Trade Receivables that was asked by a viewer on two separate RichTV videos. I say their answers were wrong. Setti’s answer was especially poor.
Their answers were NOT EVER explained thoroughly. You don’t even know why they were wrong because you know less about the high Trade Receivables question and the right answer than they did. That question went right over your head and now you think it was “explained thoroughly” because you have no clue about the right answer. You are full of BS.
I know the correct answer because I did DD the right way and that gives me a heads-up about what is really going on with this company. My DD gave me the clues about why TAAT will most likely never be the huge success you think. I’d explain it but I’d be wasting my time.
Here’s a clue for you: I suspect Setti tried to bluff an answer because he did not want to give the correct answer in public. I can’t believe Setti would actually believe that dumb answer he gave. The real reason involved HLND and the purchase and the reason why the purchase price appeared on the low side. The high Trade Receivables are the tip of the iceberg. There were a number of other interesting events that support my conclusions. You’ll never figure it out because you are not a real investor like the rest of us.
BigTime clue: I am not Daryl Stoxxman and everything you have posted about the posters here named Daryl has been wrong.
You need to check out the psychological aspects of the personality trait called “projection” . That will help you understand why I find your posts so hilarious and rather dumb.
Here’s more questions for you:
Why did this Daryl buy thousands of TAAT shares again recently?
Does he know something you don’t?
Daryl aka NOT STOXXMAN.
Stopping the lies of the stupid frog.