RE:RE:RE:Sorrenson implies FAT test is just for funThink about this for a minute. Who ( except yourself ?) would consider ordering Hundreds of plasma torches from one supplier without evaluating other product from other suppliers...If you think that paper patent on a simple idea prevent this ...think again...You can bet your last dollar that the first company to develop the technology to succesfully prepared iron ore pellets using a plasma torch, after years of development and real scale piloting will get full process patent protection...Your confusing process patent with equipment patent. Without even mentioning the product development in line with the steel industry changes from blast furnace to direct reduction approach. Thats why, in spite of PYR desperately looking for publicity...the selected equipment supplier is going to be excluded from these developments...Basic but real scientific approach...Check with Winston...GLTA.P.S. Stop worrying about the small trip to Montreal...Its part of fringe benefits included in the deal!
ScienceFirst wrote: Unable to come up with a simple answer to a simple question asked, Sorrenson had to delegate to his friend Raphaelle2, that couldn't do a better with his laughable answer that he then turned into a question! So lolll
Raphaelle2 is even more illogic! VALE would not take PYR seriously according to this clown. But then, why would they have ordered a torch, came to Montreal for the SAT test and then have the torch delivered to their site in Brazil for a final FAT test?
These shorts are so easy to debunk. They trip onto their own shoelaces