TSXV:RHT.H - Post by User
Comment by
qwerty22on Nov 02, 2022 1:38pm
175 Views
Post# 35067062
RE:RE:RE:RE:Q4 results
RE:RE:RE:RE:Q4 results Another thing. The omicron wave is an exceptional circumstance. Suddenly, all at once, they lose their recurring revenue (presumably from >50% of their on-boarded if you believe in exponential growth). But it highlight that patients aren't forever cash cows. Any health issue can interrupt revenue payments influenza, their chronic conditions, maybe even just the common cold if these patients fear it's Covid. So we can't just assume once settled on the system a patient automatically pays every month, maybe it's 11 months out of 12, maybe 10, maybe 11.5 IDK but the assumption it's 12 is just part of that best case scenario they are selling. They need to start roughing up the edges of the story they are spinning so that expectation come into line with what they can deliver. Constantly disappointing is not a good scenario.
qwerty22 wrote:
So with the recurring revenue model it's hard to explain with an expanding business how revenue suddenly drops like this other than with something as major as Covid hitting it hard. The thing is you would imagine they could have shown this clearly with numbers not just words. From the sounds of things they can breakdown revenue monthly. You would expect they could show the dip and the recovery as the wave passed.
It all comes down to numbers with Reliq now. We've had enough sweet words. Explain it with numbers,. Not estimates, solid in the bank numbers.
theinvestor22 wrote: I think mingzhu's numbers are off, partly because of reporting glitches. For software, if you take whole year rev of 2,740k and deduct Q3 rev of 1,067k and H1 rev of 888k (taken from the 6 month figure on page 3 of the Dec financials), you get 785k for Q4. My hardware number is 1,504k for Q4.
qwerty22 wrote: Thanks, where did you get the Q breakdown of revenue into software and hardware? I went back through the documents reported on SEDAR and for Q1 and Q2 they didn't seem to be breaking it down. Maybe I looked at the wrong document.