Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. T.TRQ

Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd is a global mining company that primarily mines copper, gold, and coal in the Asia-Pacific region. The company holds a 66% interest in Oyu Tolgoi, one of the world's largest copper-gold-silver mines, which ships concentrate to customers in China. Oyu Tolgoi is located in the South Gobi region of Mongolia, approximately 550 km south of the capital, Ulaanbaatar, and 80 km north of the Mongolia-China border. The company also holds interests in companies that mine...


TSX:TRQ - Post by User

Comment by Countrygenton Nov 06, 2022 9:59pm
214 Views
Post# 35077982

RE:RE:It’s happening…maybe.

RE:RE:It’s happening…maybe.

 

Just my two cents on parsing the Pentwater/Sailingstone special treatment.  You tell me how the proxy solicitation was materially correct in omitting the full particulars of this deal before asking the remainder of the minority for their proxies?  Every proxy is now tainted.  Wouldn't you have wanted to know before you threw in at the original offer?

That should be fatal procedurally.  Remember a lot of people only know what came through their mailbox and they responded to after perusing the solicitation and the offer.  They haven't followed or understand all the dissent nonsense.  But they sure would smell a rat if it was a laid out for them.

Then substantively, is is acceptable during the pendency of an offer to make this kind of agreement to procure an abstention from a material number of shareholders that would tilt the result?  Not in my and others views.  Not lawful.  But leave that to the regulators to figure out.

My preferred solution, Rio withdraws their offer, they eat their promise to cover costs, tough luck, and then come back fresh with a new offer AFTER a lock-up negotiation that incorporates the halting of their litigation with Pentwater and Sailingstone if that's what it takes.  One price for everybody.

Harumph!

cg


 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>