Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

MountainWest Resources Inc. C.MWR



CSE:MWR - Post by User

Post by aurwaron Nov 07, 2022 10:58pm
332 Views
Post# 35080884

June 2012 Judgements….Evidence of fraud?

June 2012 Judgements….Evidence of fraud?

Re case C1036-2021. JRL's lawsuit suing Claro/ Ossa...

Below is an excerpt from a court affidavit submitted by Alvaro Vives Martens, Attorney for Claro/ Ossa.
The full affidavit, as submitted to the court, was first published on this site translated by MTSTACK on Aug. 21, 2022

In reviewing this document in greater detail, I was very interested to note the dates on the 3 judgements listed below. IMO, it supports a claim of fraud, as these judgements were not disclosed to MWR/ MSX shareholders in a timely way.

As the Chilean lawyer for JRL....JGT would have to have disclosed these judgement results to him. I want to know why MSX was not informed...along with all the other judgements in the affidavit.

These ones are of particular interest to myself and a few key investors, as JRL was pushing MSX for Private Placements to fund continued Chilean court activity.

If these judgement results had been disclosed to investors...you can bet your bottom dollar there would have been no investors.

  1. Judgment of June 8, 2012 pronounced by the 1st Court of Letter of Vallenar in C 788-2011 that accepted the lawsuit for public action of expiration (Article 70 of the Mining Code) filed by Mr. Sebastian Herrera Larrain against the mining claim “Amarillo Sur 4 1-30” the property of Mr. Jorge Rodrigo Cortes and ordered the cancellation of the registration in the Registry of Discoveries of Mines of the Conservator of Mines.
  2. Judgment of June 15, 2012 pronounced by the 1st Court of Letter of Vallenar in C 789-2011 that accepted the lawsuit for public action of expiration (Article 70 of the Mining Code) filed by Mr. Sebastian Herrera Larrain against the mining claim “Amarillo Sur 5 1-30” the property of Mr. Jorge Rodrigo Cortes and ordered the cancellation of the registration in the Registry of Discoveries of Mines of the Conservator of Mines.
  3. Judgment of June 8, 2012 pronounced by the 1st Court of Letter of Vallenar in C 790-2011 that accepted the lawsuit for public action of expiration (Article 70 of the Mining Code) filed by Mr. Sebastian Herrera Larrain against the mining claim “Amarillo Sur 8 1-30” the property of Mr. Jorge Rodrigo Cortes and ordered the cancellation of the registration in the Registry of Discoveries of Mines of the Conservator of Mines
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>