RE:RE:RE:RE:BrandyLooks like Skarn calculated the CO2 estimations for both companies and FLYN is 0.99 tonnes of CO2 per tonne Nickel equivalent, as compared to CNC's 2.05.
Importantly, carbon sequestration seems applicable to both companies but is not factored into these numbers.
I've been told by posters on this board that my math skills are below that of a second grader, so it's probably worth getting a second opinion. Is 0.99 less than half of 2.03?
EndZonefor7 wrote: Not seeing any net zero carbon in their info. Old project and half undergound by looks of it. Correct me if I'm wrong.