WHERE'S THE - TSX ?Why didn't they assemble their own dream team to pair with listed stocks ?
After all, they know first hand what they have on the exchange and know best how to strengthen the exchange - right ?
Prepare yourself... ( excerpt )
This comes at a time when we are seeing a shift (back) to stakeholder capitalism, where companies are being asked to take a fulsome view of their purpose and value to stakeholders beyond their shareholders. This shift has underscored the importance of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, a multi-stakeholder approach to incite change.
The Agenda, created in 2015, consists of 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets that can be used by corporations as a voluntary reporting framework. The SDGs specifically address the challenges of an interlinked civilization that seeks to create peace, just transitions, and sustainable production and consumption. Stakeholder capitalism, if it were to be measured, could start with SDG reporting.
LINK -
https://www.tsx.com/company-services/learning-academy?id=469 Massive restructuering of global businesses, and they haven't even figured out how to deal with
the carbons - like i pointed out in a former post - from one of their partner websites.
Could these " haven't yet figured out " hurdles contribute to the gridlock of moving businesses forward ? In my opinion, if a company has ( co2 ) to resolve, how can they move forward if, no real viable solutions have been devised to ressolve a - co2 ?
In theory, it would keep the company in a perpetual ressolve - or... guess they could just hide the co2 emmssions under ground - charge a co2 fee - for doing so. wink. There's a brilliant way to
ccreate new taxes...lol
CO2 - is it good or bad ?
Have there been enough studies performed to address the carbonic acid damages to the coal seems which, is an entirely diff subject and one of which poses great concern to the geology of how carbonic acids would react with water tables that could/might drain from thier strata lenses - due to coal seems disintergrating from strong acids. ? Surely not the best solution, but great at making cheap hydrogen... yup, quick fix, quick money making hydrogen, but what are the long term effects - clean up 100 yrs from now - tainted water ?
Co2 has many benifits. Most just don't know.
There's even a short video - in link above - that is... if you can bare to watch it.
4 min mark forward. (
...and involving our stakeholders )
Sounds like someone created a massive " stakeholder " conglomeracy..
Several companies under the - SDG - ( sustainable development goals ).
The portal where companies must walk through to come out on other side of, massive change.
Yet... many ciritcal mineral projects, minerals that are supposedly needed, SIT IDLE.
Which begs... where are the current " large corporations " getting their minerals from ?
Ahhhh.... China ?
Take lithim for example... many smaller companies are sitting on massive resources...
Can't pass permitting or enviro games...
Which does what ?
Allows a clear path for those that are mining - to reap full profits without any competition.
And... super inflated lithium prices - all the more profits.
I figure - if this continues... larger corps will have reaped the highest profits during robusts times,
and have al lthe more monies to control the next cycle of, new critical metals... to continue their dominence. lol - while others are still jumping the - SDG's and hoops.
Like a football game... someone has a stacked defence. wink..
Here i thought...
lithium battery markets were distruptive...
SDG is the grand kuhunah - mother of all, distruptive.
THERE YOU HAVE IT. - stakeholder capitalism
- multistakholder approach
- BEYOND THEIR SHAREHOLDERS ( that's you and me )
Question ? Has stakeholder capitalism been placed above shareholders ?
What does the present market look like ?
Bottomed out, waiting for a pairing w ith a stakeholder ?
Many stocks with critical minerals, but are only a few chosen ?
Is this capitalism, or something else ?
Are there enough stakeholders to go around ?
Or... is the stakeholder model a keen way to reshape the future with a stakeholders spin guiding the future while selectively choosing whose accepted or not ?
How long does it take to jump the hoops of SDG's ?
Has anyone added up the costs in which is dished out to these new organizations ?
What are there successes ratios - have any companies been successful running this path ?
Or... more like, processing companies ensuring they, cooperate with - carbon taxes and other ?
How long does it take a group of advisors to pair a critical minerals company with stakeholder or capital to get them up n running ? I've looked at a few sites.. some of the personel look awefully young - are they capable pairing businesses ?
Great websites, thoughtful models, but... are these models successful, or... have they contributed to the market valuation losses - where investors are sitting, waiting, looking for a turn around ?
Gov'ts Stakeholders, Partners, Indigenous...
Where's the round table seat for,
common investors ?
Has this new model, consumed all future profits, none left for investors ?
" BEYOND THEIR SHAREHOLDERS "
The TSX should've crreated their own "resolve " .
At least it would be under the same umbrella and not organizations outside the, TSX.
Seems evereything has been put on hold, while
investors monies are trapped in depressed markets waiting upon, sustainables, partners, stakeholders... what a mess.
Is this current model.... investor capitalism or, something else that crept in ?
Many junior's have rolled which wipes out investors wealth - even after rolls - after investors wealth destroyed - stcoks still sit idle - could we use these stats as a - litmus test for SDG's ?
Surely... there must be a better way - - Own opinion.
I agree with change...
Better practices for, enviroment.
But... i prefer former practices whereas, any company had a chance at, succeeding.
This new system is far too complex, with no real answers, with a whole bunch of sustainables that act as, resistence - towards up n coming compaines that want to, deliver.
But, how can they ?
Perhaps... juniors in B.C. should team firstly with their local - first nations -
such would ensure full respect and guaranteed involvement by default - if and upon, the first nation tribe signed new treaties at a later date. Not doing so prior, and " others " signing new treaties with first nations - leaves the junior with resources along with investors on the other side of the fence - at a disadvantage.
EG - junior offers xx amount to first nation tribe.
- both in agreence and set. ( their own treaty )
- larger entities who want new treaties - would have to accept this...
which ensures shareholders have a stake too. ( protects shareholders vested interest )
- far better than, sitting back - watch another sign treaties and wait for their next card hand.
Own opinion.
Cheers....