RE:CIBC and AnonymousMustlovedogs01 wrote: Both are continuing their control of MOZ. Even Matt can see the weeks of this game simply by typing in MOZ. The unfriendlies in my view. It would sure be justified if insiders were required to report their short positons. Would that not be a rational policy? Down 78% for an asset of MOZ's quality? Hmm?? It would sure be a good job to short in the high $3's with understanding that the bottom would fall out for...????, cover a short under $1.00 and then recieve stock options at $1.10. Gee, that would be a good job...and throw in a salary for your hard work and success!!! I'm not saying this is what happened, but I don't think for a minute that it couldn't and wasn't. The truth is out there and due to lack of short disclosures by insiders, will never know. Just some reflections on the events of MOZ. jmo
glta
Time to remove your tin hat. Apart from the outlandish conspiracy you present, it would seem that any market activity by insiders would require a report. any buys or sells - regardless of whether those sells are short or not. Or are you saying they are outright illegally not reporting???
Also, a little research shows that the short position on MOZ has been consistently between 1.5-2M since the spring (certianly not unusual for a float of this size) - it did spike to 9M around the financing (reporting period spans pre and post financing) but that was covered lower and now back to 2M financing.
On thing for sure - it is bolted, glued, welded, tied, anchored in this ugly range and beaten with an ugly stick, used as a punching bag and spat upon. I am not sure what will finally move it. The financing punishment sees no end in sight. Management threw the long time shareholders under the bus. Caring about their own jobs and mine building aspirations. that's not tin hat stuff but the actual reality.
tC