RE:RE:Onward
note not "double the power" the release said "higher power levels" but still regardless the sentiment and principle of this constantly falling as another poster said while heating was going well was very disdainful. If there were bigger problems and issues going on vs going well or in accordance to expectation than those should have been stated that way and if the share value collapsed that would have been a different thing but as it stands that was never the case and therefore was not justifiable for the share implosion. Providing this climbed to where it should have been a buck or more let's say a buck having dropped by no more than 50 percent after the heat was turned off to fix parts I would say ok that is a hit and perhaps the drop is warranted because as is the case it has been and continues to be over a quarter of lost time. But that didn't happen this just plummeted and the management did nothing to prevent that and found itself doing a .27 second current raise. Like I said I should have ditched some when this fell below .68 which theoretically should have been the floor but even fell lower than half of that. Unless things were real bad during the heat the share price is absolutely inexcusable and I do look for it to hold at least to some respectable level as where it was was a huge slap in long term retail share holders faces but I guess that just goes to show one should always take some profits as you can't depend on anyone but yourself when it comes to your money all companies are and will be the same only responsible really to the primary market and their creditors shares are not what you call a debt instrument like debt and debentures and as such it rises and falls according to perceived value and it is up to us to manage what we make or lose...I will be watching this carefully while expecting it to hold as I said at least 50 percent its 52 week high which really for a stock being touted as it is should be able to do so. Anyways I said what was on my mind hopefully I don't need to say anymore. Remember this isn't a message to retailers who are getting bored and upset at what I am saying no this is to those in the company who I know read the boards and saying through it my displeasure I will again try to get in touch directly now that the private placement has closed hoping it may be a better time to do so. I want some answer especially to the point that did this company honestly not think the equipment wouldn't break down and why was there no contingency if yes. This forseeability issue is very puzzling to me. I just can't fanthom that it was not factored in.