RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Onward
as sad as this is to say it is the honest truth as to my perspective if the share value did not crash as badly as it did the fact that the equipment was "damaged" would not have bugged me as it has which is a no no. It should still be the case irrespective of the share price why was there no backup equipment? Regardless this is something whenever I can ask Geoff or whoever what the case is. I don't think it was a foreseability issue as much as a cost one however until I get the answer I am speculating on this. If Geoff or whoever says they missed it well then they missed it whether I will believe that to be the case that is the answer likewise if they say cost and hoping that the test could be completed without this damage well that too which I am tending to believe is most likely it...again I will need to ask this point blank along with why did they not do more for share support? I have said all that I have and I think beat this dead horse enough. As far as what i will do with my shares I don't know it depends whether this can hold a .40 floor at least moving forward even so I am debating whether I just hold regardless or move shares to reposition so as to avoid the same implosion and doing nothing about it which is on me unless this time I willingly do nothing that will be different but like I said I am still deciding as I am reading reports that the coming year oil and gas companies will see their healthiest balance sheets in over a decade so if that is the case no point dropping shares in the near term.