Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Vermilion Energy Inc T.VET

Alternate Symbol(s):  VET

Vermilion Energy Inc. is a Canada-based international energy producer. The Company seeks to create value through the acquisition, exploration, development, and optimization of producing assets in North America, Europe, and Australia. Its business model emphasizes free cash flow generation and returning capital to investors when economically warranted, augmented by value-adding acquisitions. The Company’s operations are focused on the exploitation of light oil and liquids-rich natural gas conventional and unconventional resource plays in North America and the exploration and development of conventional natural gas and oil opportunities in Europe and Australia. The Company operates through seven geographical segments: Canada, the United States, France, Netherlands, Germany, Ireland, and Australia. In Canada, the Company is a key player in the highly productive Mannville condensate-rich gas play. It holds a 100% working interest in the Wandoo field, offshore Australia.


TSX:VET - Post by User

Comment by masfortunaon Nov 14, 2022 10:40pm
115 Views
Post# 35098659

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Pakistan

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Pakistan
Moemoney42 wrote: Exactly Mas.. notice how quickly I got put on ignore when even a small amount of contradiction enters the conversation.. LOL.. yup.. Koolaide king doesn't want to hear that there's holes in his "end of the world stance".. too funny.!
The earth will adjust like it has over the milleniums.. but don't tell Winston.. he obviously doesn't want to give up his luxuries either.. or maybe he can buy into the "carbon credit" scam that Gore is promoting to feel better about himself.. LOL..
Or maybe he can stop the axial wobble that the earth has naturally which can, and will, cause natural disasters of its own doings.. good luck stopping the wobble.. Hehehe!
Just read recently that California has lost 18 years of carbon reduction with the last year of forest fires.. maybe the govenor could put out the fires instead of worring about a gas powered vehicle.. and that goes for Trudope as well.. instead of allowing complete towns and cities to go up in flames, along with thousands of acres of valueable timber, maybe put some money into water bombers to put the fires out, instead of having smoke filled skys in 3 provinces.. you can't tell me ignoring that is a sound carbon emission strategy.. sheesh.. the level of stupidity is unbelievable..!!
masfortuna wrote:
WinstonSmith wrote: You seem to be looking for some sort of affirmation for your denial of climate change. Cant help you with your own mischaracterizations of my comments.... find another straw man. Alt-ignore


He is not denying that climate is changing. He is stating that what we are doing is not going to solve the issue. It's virtue signalling. Here is a chart of the last 400 000 years. Do you notice something? 


1: Temperature change over the past 400,000 years correlate closely with variations in carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere (Source: https://www.klimafakten.de/behauptungen/behauptung- der-co2-anstieg-ist-nicht-ursache-sondern-folge-des-klimawandels Accessed 5 Aug 2015).  




It's a sign of the times. It's like asking someone if they are "pro-homocide".  Nobody would answrr that in the affirmative because any sane individual would be against it. I am completely in agreement with trying to curb our destruction of the planet and its ecosystems.  What I am against is giving someone a blank cheque when they have failed to convince me that their policies will actually help. And that's about it in a nutshell.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>