RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:0.24 Seriously?I did not guarantee anything about a delay or negative results. Please don't spin my words, thank you. What I said was. I said I guaranteed you pumptards will be here with your long list of excuses if there is another delay and you will be telling everyone that the delays are actually good and spin something like they need more time to perfect the technique for the FDA, blah, blah, blah. This I guarantee and I have seen it time after time again for the last 10+years on this board. Lolololol. Okay I am out, see you in 6 months. Good luck.
CAinPlap wrote: As long as you're amused! At this point, it comes down to the clinical data which we should be in possession of "shortly". All the sabre rattlin on both sides means squat in the meantime. What are the delays you are guaranteeing will happen and will they result in the clinical results coming back negative ? Myself, I am cautiously optimistic that the trial results will continue to come back positive resulting in a successful submission to the FDA and a path to a much higher shareprice.
BudFoxx2020 wrote: Thats very reasonable another 6 months is nothing after 20 years. But what if nothing happens again, the show goes on. RIGHT. This stock hit my radar in 2000. Every year since, the former CEO have promised a cancer cure is imminent. It is now 2022. So you will have to bear with me if I am skeptical. Like I said if they pull this off, this is an investment of a lifetime, that is why I still check this stock every now and then. I can't wait to see in 6 months when there is more delays and I will guarantee you and your pumptard buddies will be here with another whole list of explanation. Lolol. See you in 6 months. I am only here for the entertainment.